Iran - to attack or not to attack??

[Lou]

Anyone read those crazy comments this morning from Iran? What a crazy situation....I wonder if we bomb them or we get played by their govt?

[Svenwulf]

I think Brzez has been spot on since at least 2003. An older overview (1997), i found these comments worth the read.
http://www.comw.org/pda/fulltext/9709brzezinski.html
A geostrategy for Eurasia by Zbigniew Brzezinskiing.

[reef]

I say bomb the mfer's. We should have finished the job in Afghanistan, not gone to Iraq and bombed Iran. THEN we should have gone into Iraq, but by then Sadaam would have been shitting a brick and likely would have pulled a "Libya" and given up all his plans for nukes. IMHO.

[Hanger]

I say we do nothing right now,

Iraq will look like nothing compared to Iran. I think the only people that hate us worse more than Iraq are the Iranians. But the Ayatollah of Iran has a point, we attack them, we can forget oil as it goes to $100 a barrel. Definately hurt this country.

The Bush Administration and the rest of the Republicans will not let us attack Iran yet. We might but it will be after elections.

[InvestingMoron]

Congratulations, Israel. You've succeeded in talking the American lemming sheeple into wanting to fight the war you started.

If you think we should make a pre-emptive and unsubstantiated attack on Iran, perhaps you should move to Israel and join your fellow terrorists in working on their plans for world domination. Remember to bring your AK-47 and M-16's so that you can shoot innocent Palestinians as you steal their land, burn their houses and fields, and rape their women.

When are you lemmings going to think for yourselves, open your eyes, and notice that Israeli influence in the US is going to lead to its demise? We need to let Israel reap what it sows. Picking for a war then running behind the back of the US isn't going to save Israel forever. One day, I can imagine that the citizens of the US will wake up and have enough of their soldiers dying in foreign lands.

We (US citizens) no longer dictate our foreign policy, nor do we decide which battles we fight. Israeli influence has reached BS proportions beyond their wildest dreams. Let Iran deal with the world problem and get rid of them once and for all.

[Leb]

Originally Posted by reef

I say bomb the mfer's. We should have finished the job in Afghanistan, not gone to Iraq and bombed Iran. THEN we should have gone into Iraq, but by then Sadaam would have been shitting a brick and likely would have pulled a "Libya" and given up all his plans for nukes. IMHO.

wow ur so damn smart.. ESPECIALLY since you think that saddam had the resources to get nukes ... btw go help ur buddies look for wmds in iraq.. im sure u still think that they existed

[Leb]

btw i dont think the US should be worried about iran at all... as a matter of fact even if iran gets nukes .. they wont pose any threat to US soil... (well not until tehy get long ranged ballistics)

[Leb]

hmm actually i take back what i just said.. iran does pose a threat if tehy pass nuclear material to terrorists .. but what i was trying to say is.. i dont see why the US has to always put itself on the line to make things safer for all the other countries in the world

and btw im not even from the US

[reef]

I agree with your third reply, lol. I have always thought that Iraq didnt have nukes or their "mobile nuke vans" lol but Saddam definitely wanted to get his hands on them. I never wanted our guys going over to Iraq again but it happened and now we have to finish the job. I'd rather see diplomatic solutions to it, but it just isnt going to happen the way I see it. I wish the US could just stick their nose out of everything but Bush's little buddy Osama felt he needed to start a war.

[optimus25]

Damn, oil's gonna go up if we bomb them. BTW, so will inflation due to higher energy costs. Oil $100/barrell here we come.