PDA

View Full Version : T Boone Pickens


freakscene
08-07-2008, 09:43 AM
we've all seen the commercials. we've all heard the rhetoric "we cant drill our way out", which is nonsense.

but what is motivating Mr T Boone?

turns out his motives aren't so altruistic after all.

All 3 pieces written by Steven Milloy of Junk Science. If you only read one, read the last from which the quotes were taken.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,379702,00.html

http://www.junkscience.com/ByTheJunkman/20080724.html

http://junkscience.com/ByTheJunkman/20080731.html



The more you learn about T. Boone Pickens’ plan to switch America to wind power, the more you realize that he seems willing to say and do just about anything to make another billion or two.

This column previously discussed the plan’s technical and economic shortcomings and marketing ruses. Today, we’ll look into the diabolical machinations behind it.............

..........At Pickens’ behest, the Texas legislature changed state law to allow the two residents of an 8-acre parcel of land in Roberts County to vote to create a municipal water district, a government agency with eminent domain powers. Who were the voters? They were Pickens’ wife and the manager of Pickens’ nearby ranch. And who sits on the board of directors of this water district? They are the parcel’s three other non-resident landowners, all Pickens’ employees.

A member of a local water conservation board told Bloomberg News that, “[Pickens has] obtained the right of eminent domain like he was a big city. It’s supposed to be for the public good, not a private company.”

What’s this got to do with Pickens’ wind-power plan? Just as he needs pipelines to sell his water, he also needs transmission lines to sell his wind-generated power. Rights of way for transmission lines are also acquired through eminent domain -- and, once again, the Texas legislature has come to Pickens’ aid.

Earlier this year, Texas changed its law to allow renewable energy projects (like Pickens’ wind farm) to obtain rights-of-way by piggybacking on a water district’s eminent domain power. So Pickens can now use his water district’s authority to also condemn land for his future wind farm’s transmission lines.

Who will pay for the rights-of-way and the transmission lines and pipelines? Thanks to another gift from Texas politicians, Pickens’ water district can sell tax-free, taxpayer-guaranteed municipal bonds to finance the $2.2 billion cost of the water pipeline. And then earlier this month, the Texas legislature voted to spend $4.93 billion for wind farm transmission lines. While Pickens has denied that this money is earmarked for him, he nevertheless is building the largest wind farm in the world.

Despite this legislative largesse, a fly in the ointment remains.

Although Pickens hopes to sell as much as $165 million worth of water annually to Dallas alone, no city in Texas has signed up yet -- partly because they don’t yet need the water and partly because of resentment against water profiteering.

aiki14
08-07-2008, 09:53 AM
Want oil for another few hundred years, all from domestic production? How did the Germans and the Japanese get fuel for their war machine during WWII? How did South Africa get fuel during the apartheid embargo (and still use the process today?
The Fischer-Tropsch process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer-Tropsch

http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_documents/presentations/acs2001_chicago/chic_slide01.htm

No remaking car engines, no dangerous nat gas tanks, no inefficient batteries, no hydrogen fuel cells, no gas station modifications. And the cool thing is the Republicans should like it since it has the Nazi/Apartheid connection. (just kidding freak :twisted:)

freakscene
08-07-2008, 10:30 AM
Want oil for another few hundred years, all from domestic production? How did the Germans and the Japanese get fuel for their war machine during WWII? How did South Africa get fuel during the apartheid embargo (and still use the process today?
The Fischer-Tropsch process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer-Tropsch

http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_documents/presentations/acs2001_chicago/chic_slide01.htm

No remaking car engines, no dangerous nat gas tanks, no inefficient batteries, no hydrogen fuel cells, no gas station modifications. And the cool thing is the Republicans should like it since it has the Nazi/Apartheid connection. (just kidding freak :twisted:)



All kidding aside, I fail to see what that had to do with the thread?

I'll take a stab at it and suggest you didn't read it about T Boone acquiring eminent domain powers for himself and creating a billion dollar water monopoly which is his real motivation behind the "wind" campaign?

:)

BuyOnDips
08-07-2008, 10:48 AM
Of course T Bonne is talking his book. He wants make money. Can't blame him there.

Coal is certainly one option to use. Those plants are huge that convert coal to oil. They also would provide lots of good paying jobs. Eventually, the USA will have to go nuclear and future cars will be electric. Also our nations electric grid needs to be dramatically updated.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06229/714268-28.stm


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuL4g4h8NOc

freakscene
08-07-2008, 10:56 AM
He wants make money. Can't blame him there.



but gaming the Texas legislature and acquiring eminent domain powers for a billion dollar water monopoly?

thats shady and underhanded.

i hope for a T Boone backlash in the State after the first person loses their property so he can make his money.

actually, it appears as if the backlash has already begun

aiki14
08-07-2008, 01:04 PM
All kidding aside, I fail to see what that had to do with the thread?

I'll take a stab at it and suggest you didn't read it about T Boone acquiring eminent domain powers for himself and creating a billion dollar water monopoly which is his real motivation behind the "wind" campaign?

:)

I was trying to relate to his oil canard that we need to use wind or other methods to reduce our dependence on oil.
And I didn't see that, but I am really not all that surprised.